Which statement about read-back of orders is true?

Which statement about read-back of orders is true?

• A. Some agencies require TOs and VOs to be reviewed and signed by two nurses
• B. All orders must be read back by the physician
• C. Read-back is optional in all agencies
• D. TORB is not required

Answer: (A)

Read-back of orders is a safety check used whenever orders are given verbally or by phone, to confirm that what was heard matches exactly what will be acted on. In many healthcare settings, policies require that telephone or verbal orders (TOs/VOs) be read back and then reviewed by two nurses who both sign off. This double check helps catch errors in drug names, dosages, routes, or frequencies and provides coverage when the prescriber isn’t present to confirm the order in person. That’s why this statement matches real practice: two-nurse review and sign-off for TOs and VOs is a recognized safety measure. The other ideas don’t fit common practice: read-back isn’t limited to physicians, and it isn’t optional in all agencies. TORB (telephone order read-back) is typically part of standard safety processes, not something that can be universally dismissed.

Read-back of orders is a safety check used whenever orders are given verbally or by phone, to confirm that what was heard matches exactly what will be acted on. In many healthcare settings, policies require that telephone or verbal orders (TOs/VOs) be read back and then reviewed by two nurses who both sign off. This double check helps catch errors in drug names, dosages, routes, or frequencies and provides coverage when the prescriber isn’t present to confirm the order in person. That’s why this statement matches real practice: two-nurse review and sign-off for TOs and VOs is a recognized safety measure.

The other ideas don’t fit common practice: read-back isn’t limited to physicians, and it isn’t optional in all agencies. TORB (telephone order read-back) is typically part of standard safety processes, not something that can be universally dismissed.